Library · Diagnostics

Tests, scans, and sequencing — read the signal, not the noise.

Modern diagnostics generate more data than most clinicians have time to interpret. We cover what each test measures, the population it was validated in, the false-positive rate, and the actions a result should and should not trigger.

Reviewed by
Biosphere Medical Advisory Board
Last updated
May 2026

Key takeaways

Pre-test probability rules

A test's positive predictive value depends on how likely the condition is before the test. Screening low-risk populations produces mostly false positives, even with 'accurate' tests.

Reference range ≠ optimal

Lab reference intervals describe the middle 95% of the testing population — not a healthy target. Ferritin, vitamin D, and TSH ranges in particular invite over- and under-treatment.

Genetics is probabilistic

Most common variants shift risk by single-digit percentages. Polygenic scores are improving but rarely change individual management today.

Incidentalomas have a cost

Whole-body MRI and full-body CT find 'something' in 15–30% of healthy adults. Most are benign, but the workup carries real morbidity, cost, and anxiety.

Articles in this topic

Lipids

Apolipoprotein B and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Genetic analyses across 654,783 participants show ApoB is the principal driver of coronary heart disease risk among atherogenic lipoproteins; LDL-C and triglycerides add no independent risk after ApoB is accounted for. Strongest case yet for ApoB as the primary lipid target.

Richardson et al., PLOS Med, 2020

Agrade
11 min
Lipids

Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Disease — A 2022 NLA Scientific Statement

National Lipid Association consensus that Lp(a) should be measured at least once in adulthood; levels above ~50 mg/dL (125 nmol/L) are an independent risk enhancer that reframes prevention thresholds. Largely genetically determined and stable across the lifespan.

Koschinsky et al., J Clin Lipidol, 2024

A−grade
10 min
Inflammation

C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin 6, and Risk of Cardiovascular Events

Patient-level meta-analysis of 31,245 patients on statins showed hs-CRP and IL-6 were as strong as LDL-C in predicting future MACE. Supports residual inflammatory risk as a treatment target.

Ridker et al., Lancet, 2023

Agrade
9 min
Imaging

Coronary Artery Calcium Score for Personalizing Cardiovascular Risk

Pooled MESA cohort analyses show CAC = 0 confers ~10-year MACE risk under 1% in asymptomatic adults, while CAC ≥100 reclassifies many patients to statin eligibility. Endorsed by 2018 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines for borderline/intermediate risk.

Grundy et al., Circulation, 2019 (ACC/AHA)

Agrade
9 min
Imaging

Whole-Body MRI Screening in Asymptomatic Adults: A Systematic Review

Pooled data show clinically significant findings in 1–2% of self-referred adults but incidental findings in 15–35%, with downstream workup costs and morbidity. Useful for high-risk individuals (e.g., Li-Fraumeni); not supported as general screening.

Hegenscheid et al., Eur Radiol, 2013

C+grade
12 min
Imaging

DEXA for Osteoporosis Screening: USPSTF Recommendation Statement

Grade B recommendation for screening women ≥65 and younger postmenopausal women at increased risk; DEXA is the reference standard for bone mineral density and fracture risk estimation. Same scan provides validated body composition outputs.

USPSTF, JAMA, 2018

Agrade
7 min
Genetics

CPIC Guidelines for Pharmacogenomic Testing

Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium publishes evidence-graded gene-drug guidelines (CYP2C19/clopidogrel, CYP2D6/codeine, HLA-B/abacavir, TPMT/thiopurines). The 'A' level guidelines are the practical core of pharmacogenomics.

Relling & Klein, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2011 (and updates)

A−grade
11 min
Genetics

NCCN Guidelines: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment — Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic

Identifying BRCA1/2, PALB2, Lynch syndrome and related variants alters surveillance intervals, prophylactic surgery, and PARP inhibitor eligibility. Cascade testing of first-degree relatives multiplies clinical impact.

NCCN Guidelines (current version)

Agrade
10 min
Genetics

Analytical Validity of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests for BRCA Variants

Comparison of 23andMe-style single-variant panels against clinical sequencing showed high false-negative rates; consumer reports test only 3 of >1,000 known pathogenic BRCA variants. Confirmatory clinical-grade testing required before any medical action.

Tandy-Connor et al., Genet Med, 2018

B+grade
9 min
Microbiome

American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice Update on Microbiome Testing

AGA finds insufficient evidence to recommend stool microbiome testing for diagnosis or treatment outside of C. difficile and select inflammatory conditions. Personalized diet recommendations from these tests are not yet evidence-based.

Staller et al., Gastroenterology, 2024

C+grade
8 min
Wearables

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults Without Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Reviews show CGM detects post-prandial excursions invisible to fingerstick testing, but evidence that non-diabetic excursions predict long-term outcomes remains limited. Behavioral feedback effects on diet are the most consistently demonstrated benefit.

Holzer et al., Nutrients, 2022

Bgrade
9 min
Cancer screening

A Prospective Study of Multi-Cancer Detection Test in Symptomatic Patients (SYMPLIFY)

6,238 symptomatic patients evaluated with the Galleri MCED test; overall sensitivity 66.3%, specificity 98.4%, with sensitivity rising sharply with stage. Mortality benefit data from large RCTs (e.g., NHS-Galleri) are still pending.

Nicholson et al., Lancet Oncol, 2023

Bgrade
13 min